Expert Opinion on Death Investigation Center for Medicine Related Death

Korean J Leg Med. 2010 May;34(1):7-14. Korean.

Seoul Medical Surgical Clinic, Seoul, Korea

Department of Forensic Medicine and Institute of Forensic Medicine, Seoul National

University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sdlee@snu.ac.kr

To check expert opinion about the investigation system of medicine-related death, model for “Death Investigation Center”was suggested and related questionnaire were requested. Between 15 December 2009 and 5 April 2010, we sent e-mails of the questionnaire which asked the opinion for the new postmortem investigation system. We sent the questionnaire to 3,289 lawyers and 4,523 doctors (total 7812), and received 100 replies out of the total. All the lawyers and doctors interviewed knew the importance of the postmortem investigation system. Most of them (87%) agreed to the introduction of the new postmortem investigation system. Some of them thought that protector’s agreement was necessary for the postmortem investigation (21%), and more doctors were likely to participate with legal protocol (23%). If the postmortem investigation could not be performed due to the protector’s disagreement, another specialized medical investigation should be needed to figure out the cause of death (85%). The new postmortem investigation system should be performed by the specific institution, and supported by the government (44%). In many expert’s opinion, nonmedical experts such as lawyers and priests should be included for the institution of investigation for objectivity and neutrality (72%). This sample study finds that the postmortem investigation performed by specialized institution is necessary to determine the cause of death in the hospital. For the operation of the system, neutrality and the operating core would be the most important.

Key words : death investigation center, medicine-related death, expert, questionnaire

Original article